[10174] in bugtraq
Re: ipop3d (x2) / pine (x2) / ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (GvS)
Mon Apr 12 16:26:22 1999
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:07:12 +0400
Reply-To: GvS <gvs@RINET.RU>
From: GvS <gvs@RINET.RU>
X-To: Pine Team <Pine@CAC.Washington.EDU>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.4.20.9904081810410.25265-100000@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Hi there!
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Mark Crispin wrote:
MC> We thought these claims required a response from us since they contain
MC> misleading information and only about 20% fact. And by the way, we were
MC> not contacted before this post was made to BUGTRAQ, as protocol states.
[snip]
The experience says: it's useless lack of time to report something to
you. Michal (and me) had some conversations (about pine locking world
writable, e.g.) before with no reasonable results - so why contact you
first? It seems like you love the things you made too strong to react
for any issues related. Using pine for almost three years, I still
need to patch the any new version. People who used imap3d and ipop3d
said something similar about them.
Your development team occupates position which doesn't seem wise. I
myself can't see any point of reason to inform you about patches
available, but I can see the direct reason to inform bugtraq
subscribers.
SY, Seva Gluschenko, just stranger at the Road.
GVS-RIPE: Cronyx Plus / RiNet network administrator.
--- IRC: erra
* Origin: Erra Netmale (gvs@rinet.ru) [http://gvs.rinet.ru/]
