[724] in ad-lib
Re: Re: Son of Spurious Add'l. Holdings
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (steps@MIT.EDU)
Wed May 31 10:02:53 1995
To: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 31 May 95 09:59:41
From: steps@MIT.EDU
So, I decided to try Eric's suggestion of removing the $c of the 049 on
LCN10637863 to see if the phantom would fade into the sunset, too. Nope.
When I went back to the same record and re-added the $c to the 049, I got
yet another dummy item record.
Woe to the 049 $c,
Stephanie
In your message of Tue, 30 May 95 15:35:59 you said:
To: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Son of Spurious Add'l. Holdings
Date: Tue, 30 May 95 15:35:59
From: steps@MIT.EDU
Walter and co.,
I just created a phantom on LCN10637863 by adding a $c to the 049.
However, this didn't happen when I added 049s ($a and $c) to my serial test
records (see Stephanie's test puppies). I'm not sure what this distinction
is...if a 049 exists without a $c and you add one, the system thinks it's a
holding...but if you add a 049 $a and $c, it doesn't create a phantom.
Huh?
Stephanie
In your message of Tue, 30 May 1995 14:59:31 EDT you said:
To: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Subject: Son of Spurious Add'l. Holdings
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 14:59:31 EDT
From: wpowers@MIT.EDU
I've found that I can cause a record that was not exhibiting the
phantom holding phenomenon to do so by adding a $c to the 049 field.
It appears from my brief sampling that records without 049 $c's are
not causing the phantoms to appear; can others confirm or deny?
Very lifelike, Walter
------- End of Forwarded Message
------- End of Forwarded Message
