[702] in ad-lib
Re: Spurious Addl. Holdings
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Fri May 26 16:34:36 1995
To: Eric Celeste <efc@MIT.EDU>
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 May 1995 16:03:52 EDT."
<9505262003.AA05521@bassas.MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 16:34:15 EDT
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>
Stephen Skuce just tested Michel's theory. LCN 10054489 does not have
a 949 field. Stephen edited the call number on the record and
refiled it. The record came back with a phantom holding.
I certainly hope we can get a definitive answer about these phantom
holdings before we reload the database!
--Sarah
>> Michel says that Advance will try to create a PIECE whenever you file a
>> record with a 949?
>
>Grant, I have not tested this, so I can't comment on its veracity... but
>IF it is true, then we need to make sure that Geac strips 949's off our
>migration data before loading the records into the database!
>
>Don't we?
>
>...Eric
>
