[517] in ad-lib
Re: Forwarded message: [m.ridgeway%34@gem.geac.com:MIT - DUPLICATE VENDORS]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (cfollett@MIT.EDU)
Wed May 3 11:30:05 1995
From: cfollett@MIT.EDU
To: acq2@MIT.EDU, orbitee@MIT.EDU, gyoung@MIT.EDU (Grant Young )
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 1995 15:31:25."
<9505021932.AA28142@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 03 May 1995 11:29:33 EDT
***Grant, thanks for the info. When I search these 2 vendor codes in
GLIS I only get one hit for each record. So I took a look at the
printout of vendor records that you printed before the 1st GMA and
found that we had noticed the duplication there and subsequently
deleted the duplicate vendor in GLIS. Guess that cut-off date keeps
slipping our mind!
Any response to our other questions yet??
Charlene
>Well, I'll be darned!
>
>-- Grant
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>To: gyoung@MIT.EDU
>Subject: MIT - DUPLICATE VENDORS
>Date: Tue, 2 May 95 13:47 EDT
>From: m.ridgeway%34@gem.geac.com
>
>
>--
>Michel Ridgeway, Project Manager, Libraries m.ridgeway@geac.com
>923 West King Road, Malvern, PA 19355
>voice (610) 644-4071 fax (610) 644-0907
>
> 835 DAVID.ALEXANDER 55 02MAY95 09:14 10 Rep
> Subject: MIT - DUPLICATE VENDORS
>To: M.RIDGEWAY:34
>Cc: DAVID.ALEXANDER:55
>
>Michel,
>
>I looked at the example for the duplicate vendor at MIT.
>
>In GLIS they do have 2 vendors with the exact same vendor codes:
>
>for AMESOPH - GLIS **VEND records 1542 and 1543
>for AMEWAREA - GLIS **VEND records 795 AND 796
>
>Dave
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>
>
