[436] in ad-lib
Re: More changes to Holdings Table?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ninadm@MIT.EDU)
Wed Apr 26 12:49:29 1995
From: ninadm@MIT.EDU
To: gyoung@MIT.EDU (Grant Young )
Cc: opac-lib@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Apr 1995 18:17:20."
<9504252217.AA13382@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 12:49:01 EDT
Grant, I hadn't understood this before. Can the opac group play some
part in identifying which call prefixes/collections we think we'll
really need as qualifiers? I'm assuming all sublocs. will be added.
I definitely think public service people need to be brought into this,
since we're the ones who will have to handle the questions and the
searches. FYI there are still pockets of confusion with the material
type modifier.
N.
> We aren't planning to add qualifiers for every call prefix. We have to be
> selective about the number of qualifiers we add to the system since each
> one adds some overhead to the indexing. It might be better to make sure
> that they can be gotten at by modifiying a search with material types...
>
> -- Grant
>
