[392] in ad-lib
028 4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Fri Apr 21 15:17:05 1995
To: ad-cat@MIT.EDU, armommy@MIT.EDU
Cc: m.ridgeway@geac.com
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 15:16:45 EDT
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>
Sure enough there is a first indicator value 4 to specify
videorecording numbers. What do these numbers look like? Will they
screw up the indexing of our music pub nums? Could someone find a few
for Michel to look at when he's here next Wednesday?
Thanks.
--SGM
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 08:38:20 -0400
From: Penny_Swanson@Douglas.BC.CA
Sender: usmarc@loc.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <usmarc@loc.gov>
Subject: 028 v. 037
Could someone tell me (or remind me, if that is the case) what LC and others
are doing about the change in 028 to include an indicator for Videorecording
numbers? At present we put those numbers in 037 and it allows them to be
in a different index from music numbers. Our system can not make use of
indicator values for this purpose. Has anyone else run into this? What are
you doing?
Thanks.
Penny
- --
Penny Swanson
Technical Services Librarian
Douglas College Library, New Westminster, B.C. Canada
Internet: swansonp@douglas.bc.ca Voice: (604) 527-5259
------- End of Forwarded Message
