[294] in ad-lib
Re: MIT OCLC TABLE SPEC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Wed Apr 5 17:11:30 1995
To: Eric Celeste <efc@MIT.EDU>
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 1995 12:54:20 EDT."
<9504051654.AA04126@bassas.MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 17:11:06 EDT
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>
Yes, Geac knows to create the 930 because the 949 has the indicator
values 99, but, I still don't believe that plays a part in how it
creates the correct location and material types codes on GLIS. As far
as I know, LIOCLN is the only thing that drives that translation.
>Sarah writes...
>> Geac successfully handled the periodical translations in GLIS because we
>> had special codes (MYP) for periodicals.
>
>I don't think this is the case. We often have serials with MYG stamps that
>recieve 930 instead of 966's in our current system. I think GLIS makes the
>decision of 930 vs. 966 based on either 949 indicators or MARC record
>format. Does anyone have the real answer?
>
>...Eric
>
