[131] in ad-lib
Re: ISSUES:Non-Migration of 930 $i
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Fri Mar 10 18:08:14 1995
To: wpowers@MIT.EDU
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 1995 12:09:05 EST."
<9503101709.AA02606@alfredo.MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 18:07:56 EST
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>
It may be possible that we can have the 930 $i handled the same way as
the $n 966. I'll check with Michel.
> It appears that the 930 $i Local note subfield (corresponds to
>the 949/966 $n Local note on monographs I think) didn't make the cut for
>mapping to either 866 or 930 in Advance. Examples are at Statistical
>abstract of the United States [Computer file] (GRSN676052) and
>Automotive industries (GRSN292026) [reported to Grant]
>
>
> I thought that the $n display in Advance on the record for Global
>explorer looked OK. That's what made me wonder about local notes on
>serials records. Now I'm envious. Walter
