[26779] in resnet
Re: Bandwidth Management - Dynamic Allocation?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cal Frye)
Tue Sep 27 19:52:54 2011
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4E82615B.6030101@calfrye.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:50:51 -0400
Reply-To: Resnet Forum <RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu>
From: Cal Frye <cjf@calfrye.com>
To: RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu
In-Reply-To: <CAEPWjzvL0HanQqnApTrHY2uWL0F8d_Bfuab0TE01AJMiFq+bow@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/27/11 5:35 PM, Doughty, Marc wrote:
> Cool, this is what I would expect. With 'equal allocation', you can
> 'overcommit' by quite a bit, right?
I've never looked at it as "overcommit" - but equal division. If only
two of you are sharing the network, each gets half of the bandwidth. If
100, you each get 1%.
That said, I've not had the opportunity to run a NetEqualizer; we've so
far done this sort of thing with DPI boxes like the Packeteer on dynamic
partitioning, for instance.
--
Best regards
-- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
Mudd Library, x.56930 -- CIT will NEVER ask you for your password!
www.calfrye.com, www.oberlin.edu/cit/
"You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm. --Colette.
___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.
To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________
