[26191] in resnet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Switching from Cisco NAC to Impulse Safe Connect

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doughty, Marc)
Thu Apr 7 11:21:37 2011

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba21246138bf9404a055a977
Message-ID:  <BANLkTimkCGfh8fKcmr6yMgqcX2e6VLy38w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:         Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:21:18 -0400
Reply-To: Resnet Forum <RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu>
From: "Doughty, Marc" <marc_doughty@brown.edu>
To: RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu
In-Reply-To:  <BANLkTi=DOsN3-CBASMr7fVMgT1rCKEJygw@mail.gmail.com>

--90e6ba21246138bf9404a055a977
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Greetings,
     I wonder if schools with NAC are having significantly less trouble than
those who haven't implemented it. I've seen both, and I honestly couldn't
say if NAC really improved the overall situation enough to warrant the
overhead it incurred. Anyone see a worthwhile improvement in the overall
security/malware situation after going from nothing to NAC? Enough to
justify the time and cost of implementation?

- Marc Doughty

"If you aren't sure who is the give-way vessel, you are the give-way
vessel."


On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Joe Hatch <jhatch@trinity.edu> wrote:

> We're strongly considering switching from Cisco NAC to Safe Connect
>

___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.

To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________

--90e6ba21246138bf9404a055a977
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings,<br>=A0=A0=A0=A0 I wonder if schools with NAC are having signific=
antly less trouble than those who haven&#39;t implemented it. I&#39;ve seen=
 both, and I honestly couldn&#39;t say if NAC really improved the overall s=
ituation enough to warrant the overhead it incurred. Anyone see a worthwhil=
e improvement in the overall security/malware situation after going from no=
thing to NAC? Enough to justify the time and cost of implementation?<br cle=
ar=3D"all">
<br>- Marc Doughty<br><br>&quot;If you aren&#39;t sure who is the give-way =
vessel, you are the give-way vessel.&quot;<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Joe Hat=
ch <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jhatch@trinity.edu">jhatch@trini=
ty.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>We&#39;re strongly considering switching from Cisco NAC to Safe Connec=
t<br></div></blockquote></div>
___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.
<p>
To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________

--90e6ba21246138bf9404a055a977--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post