[25885] in resnet
Anti SPAM appliance recommendations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hulley, Thomas)
Fri Jan 28 11:32:03 2011
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <F303CED670956C499BBC9E74F0FA24FD012CACEF15A7@harrison.choate.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:31:34 -0500
Reply-To: Resnet Forum <RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu>
From: "Hulley, Thomas" <thulley@choate.edu>
To: RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu
In-Reply-To: <403119428.204889.1296226678185.JavaMail.root@esslama.earlham.edu>
We are considering replacing our current anti SPAM appliance and would like to hear about your experiences. There are lots of solutions out there, but some we are considering are Barracuda, Fortimail, Red Condor. Does anyone have any particularly good or bad experiences with these or other suggestion? How it their support? Inbound and outbound capability along user quarantine control is a must. Most seem to make similar performance and feature claims and they all seem to be able to point to some study that says theirs is better.
Thanks
Tom Hulley
Choate Rosemary Hall
___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.
To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________
