[716] in Privacy_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[ PRIVACY Forum ] Ars technica reverses,

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (privacy@vortex.com)
Mon Jun 7 22:25:38 2010

Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:07:25 -0700
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Message-ID: <20100608020725.GA18154@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
From: privacy@vortex.com
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum Digest mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Ars technica reverses, now says Safari extensions don't need Apple signing

At an "Update:" to their original story ( http://bit.ly/a33C7B ), ars
technica now suggests that (contrary to the assertion in their original
main story) Safari extensions don't necessarily need to be signed
by Apple to run.

I'd appreciate word from anyone who can pin this down definitively.

Thanks.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@vortex.com
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, NNSquad
   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, GCTIP - Global Coalition 
   for Transparent Internet Performance - http://www.gctip.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein


_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post