[392] in Privacy_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[ PRIVACY Forum ] Fears of Google Android Wiretaps and More -- Plus a

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (privacy@vortex.com)
Tue Oct 21 22:13:44 2008

Message-Id: <200810220146.m9M1ktei023444@chrome.vortex.com>
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:46:55 -0700
From: privacy@vortex.com
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum Digest mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



    Fears of Google Android Wiretaps and More -- Plus a "Security Proposal"

                http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000446.html


Greetings.  First, I'd like thank everyone who sent me topic
suggestions for last Sunday night's radio show 
( http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000443.html ).  I was able to touch
on a number of the suggestions and I hope we did them justice within
the constraints of format and time.

Now to the subject at hand.  With the first Google Android phone
(the HTC G1) hitting the streets nationally tomorrow (though some
pre-orders are already arriving, and the San Francisco T-Mobile
store is starting to sell them today) reactions to my glowing
endorsements of the Android open development and deployment model
have been arriving at an increasing pace.  Many of these reactions
are negative and sometimes rather accusatory.

My view is that Android represents a massive sea change in mobile
technology, with enormously positive potential implications for both
consumer and corporate applications.

Quite a few people are taking me to task for this opinion, and
they're suggesting that Android will bring a "pestilence" of
dangerous and contaminated applications that will destroy users'
data, wreck whatever remains of the U.S. economy, and (judging by
the intensity of some statements I've received) perhaps also disrupt
the space-time continuum. 

Concerns over the potential dangers of Android applications appear
to be raging in such quarters despite the fact that Google
reportedly has a "kill switch" that can disable renegade
applications when necessary -- a wise move in the context of such a
sophisticated mobile platform.

I'm being bombarded with a range of Android conspiracy theories and
related theoreticals, with a number of persons pointing at my own
early 2007 discussion and video "Is Your Cell Phone Bugged?" 
( http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000213.html ) and suggesting that
Android represents the ideal platform for the sorts of "wiretapping"
exploits I described.

It would be hypocritical for me to claim that an open platform like
Google doesn't carry with it different sorts of risks than
relatively closed platforms like the iPhone or Windows Mobile, not
to mention completely proprietary mobile ecosystems.

But the potential positive benefits in terms of an explosion of
wonderful applications for Android is likely to be like nothing
we've ever seen before for mobile devices, and just as with the
Internet itself, PCs, and even motor vehicles for that matter, to
get the benefits of technology we usually have to accept some risks
and potential downside aspects as well. 

In the case of Android, reputation labeling of posted applications
by the Android user community should go a long way to help weed out
disruptive programs.  And each program presents a manifest of its
resources access requirements at install time (though admittedly
there may be a tendency for many users to click-through these
without much thought or sufficient understanding of the
ramifications, and it's possible that granted privileges could be
used for other than the "advertised" purposes).

OK, there are risks.  On the other hand, it's about time that adult
users of advanced mobile devices be treated as thinking adults who
can make their own decisions about the code that they wish to run on
their phones.  Android treats its users as adults in this manner,
for the first time from any mobile system vendor.

Yet there will be persons who wish to use Android platform phones --
like the G1 -- and who may be concerned that they simply do not have
sufficient expertise to make informed judgments about which
applications are safe to run, especially for programs relatively new
on the scene.  This is a valid concern.

So I'll make the following proposal and query.  What say you to the
idea of establishing a standalone group -- structure to be
determined -- to review *completely voluntary* submissions of
Android applications for pre-release security analysis of associated
distributable installable Android packages?

This would not be a formal "certification" program, would never be a
requirement of any kind.  Nor would it offer guarantees of
applications' performance.  But it could provide a voluntary layer
of independent expertise to look over applications in advance of
release, so that those potential Android users who might be
otherwise reluctant to run various programs (e.g. those from
relatively unknown parties) can have added confidence in doing so.

Obviously, the devil is in the details for any such proposal, and I
won't even attempt to dig into such details in this posting.  But I
would hate to see users who could greatly benefit from the openness
of Android being unnecessarily scared off by the very aspects of
open development and deployment that could be of such immense value
to them.

Perhaps this sort of voluntary review program could help to bridge
the gap of concern that significant numbers of persons may feel
while moving from the dark, closed world of controlled mobile
applications, into the bright, open world of Android.

Please drop me a line with your thoughts on this proposal.  And if
you might wish to participate in such a project, please be sure to
let me know.

Thanks as always.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@vortex.com or lauren@pfir.org 
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren 
Co-Founder, PFIR
   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org 
Co-Founder, NNSquad 
   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com 
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com 
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post