[382] in Privacy_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[ PRIVACY Forum ] Google Halves Non-Anonymized Data Retention Period

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (privacy@vortex.com)
Tue Sep 9 00:15:49 2008

Message-Id: <200809090352.m893qF7d018270@chrome.vortex.com>
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:52:15 -0700
From: privacy@vortex.com
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum Digest mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



                 Google Halves Non-Anonymized Data Retention Period

                    http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000424.html


Greetings.  Google has announced that they are reducing the period
that they retain fully non-anonymized IP address log data from 18
months to 9 months ( http://tinyurl.com/google-2008-09-08 ).

Details are not available at this time, and some observers will no
doubt harangue that Google was pressured into this action by ongoing
regulatory scrutiny.

However I choose to focus on Google's decision as another step in a
continuing positive evolution of the firm over time, with the full
understanding that balancing the many complex factors associated
with this sort of log data is a decidedly non-trivial task.

Keep in mind that around the world, including in Europe and the
U.S., there are also legislative moves to *require* the lengthy
retention of a wide variety of log data, ostensibly for law
enforcement and other public safety purposes.  To say that this
creates a complicated environment for a global organization of
Google's scope is an understatement to say the least.

Despite the technology that is the visible aspect of Google to most
of us, in reality Google is actually people -- individuals with a
range of opinions at all levels within the firm.  In particular,
Google's announcement makes it explicitly and publicly clear that
they are cognizant of the often conflicting mix of forces and world
views that interplay with data retention concerns.

One thing's for sure -- these are not simple issues, and to pretend
that they can be easily resolved to everyone's satisfaction is
nothing more than an unrealistic illusion, that doesn't usefully
advance the ball at all.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@vortex.com or lauren@pfir.org 
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren 
Co-Founder, PFIR
   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org 
Co-Founder, NNSquad 
   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com 
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com 


_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post