[3770] in Privacy_Forum
[ PRIVACY Forum ] Proposed California law requires site privacy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (PRIVACY Forum mailing list)
Sat Feb 9 22:58:08 2013
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:34:06 -0800
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Message-ID: <20130210033406.GB16888@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
From: PRIVACY Forum mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Proposed California law requires site privacy polices not to exceed
8th grade language and 100 words.
We all do know that privacy policies can become long and complicated,
but they encompass complex principles. And while we're probably very
much in favor of making them as understandable as possible, trying to
limit privacy policies in such an arbitrary manner makes about as much
sense as trying to legislate the value of pi. In fact, the actual
bill itself would violate its own designated limits many times over.
And I've now just about hit the actual 100 word limit itself. Sorry
about
http://j.mp/Z2CqEF (Leginfo.ca.gov [PDF])
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein (lauren@vortex.com): http://www.vortex.com/lauren
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Founder:
- Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org
- PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
- Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org
- Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: http://www.gctip.org
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy
