[3187] in Privacy_Forum
[ PRIVACY Forum ] What logically follows AT&T's anti-neutrality move
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (PRIVACY Forum mailing list)
Sun Aug 19 11:54:56 2012
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 08:38:01 -0700
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Message-ID: <20120819153801.GB17099@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
From: PRIVACY Forum mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
What logically follows AT&T's anti-neutrality move re Apple FaceTalk
In light of AT&T's announcement that you must have a specific mobile
data plan simply in order to use Apple's FaceTalk, a reminder of this
forward-looking graphic from sometime back is definitely in order.
(Original source unclear.)
http://j.mp/NyB0sj (Lauren's Blog)
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein (lauren@vortex.com): http://www.vortex.com/lauren
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Founder:
- Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org
- PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
- Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org
- Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: http://www.gctip.org
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy
