[907] in Intrusion Detection Systems
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin J. Lister)
Sun Apr 20 02:26:44 1997
From: ruf@uow.edu.au (Justin J. Lister)
To: ids@uow.edu.au (Intrusion Detection System Mailing List)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 13:26:15 +1000 (EST)
Reply-To: ids@uow.edu.au
To: ids@uow.edu.au
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 20:26:03 PST
Subject: Re: How about
Message-ID: <19970407.202606.3926.4.UMBRA.GOV@juno.com>
References: <m0wDgj5-0005wdC@spi>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.00
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-30,40-43
From: umbra.gov@juno.com (GOD D DIETY)
>I'm new also, but I happen to like this list. In you mention of
>genetic
>algorithms, might you be suggesting an artificial intelligence method
>of
>detecting an intruder? If so I'd be happy to help you with any
>projects
>you may cook up.
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Justin J. Lister wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm new to this list, but I'll probably be a regular listener. Has
>anyone
>> been doing any work with genetic algorithms and intrusion detection?
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jeff
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Jeff Flynn & Associates
>> Network Security
>>
>> (714)551-6398 Irvine, Calif.
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>
I am not so very new to this particular list, but I have been
listening mostly until this time. In the field of genetic algorithms I
have been working the BrainTech ORB line of algorithms
<HTTP://WWW.BNTI.COM> or <EMAIL:MANFRED@EGN.COM> but at a radically
different direction than the above stated company <from whom the
algorithm was begotten>..you see my process converts text into waveform
and then uses a different system of fuzzy logic to interpret.. thereby
making a nexus guardian of sorts that can make suggestions and can
decide upon the suggestions it makes. Elegant in ideal, but programming
the damn thing is like having an breech birth from hell.
A student at a collage somewhere in the US.
