[562] in Intrusion Detection Systems

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Response to the computer criminal's introduction (FLAME WARNING)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joce (Maria) Armstrong)
Fri Feb 9 13:45:01 1996

Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 20:08:34 -0600 (CST)
From: "Joce (Maria) Armstrong" <marijean@Mcs.Net>
To: ids@uow.edu.au
In-Reply-To: <9602061143.AA25006@all.net>
Reply-To: ids@uow.edu.au

If you must respond to his introduction, then I must respond to your 
flame.  Give the guy a little respect, at least he isn't still hacking 
(or so he says.)  If you don't like the fact that he hacked then tell 
him.  I, personally, do not care to hear your prejudicial rhetoric.

I also don't think you realize how many people really ARE former 
hackers.  In my experience, the best sysadmins are former hackers.  Do us 
all a favor and don't judge people after a two paragraph introduction.

Also, I seem to remember the mention of a "no flaming" rule.  What ever 
happened to that?

[ I can't remember the rule, though my memory my be experiencing parity
errors - RuF ]

 ~Joce M. Armstrong
|=====================================|
|On AOL: Egeria13@aol.com             | 
|On MCSNet: marijean@mcs.net          | 
|=====================================|

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post