[853] in UA Senate
Re: Tonight's meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Hawkins)
Tue Oct 19 01:26:29 2010
Reply-To: hwkns@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimkgYvJn-oV6c=u0A4uKZTQXJNKR6OCJshPJSjS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:26:26 -0400
From: Daniel Hawkins <hwkns@MIT.EDU>
To: Janet Li <jli12@mit.edu>
Cc: Michael E Plasmeier <theplaz@mit.edu>, Allan E Miramonti <allanm@mit.edu>,
"ua-senate@mit.edu" <ua-senate@mit.edu>
--0015174bdc7ac7c0010492f18830
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Full disclosure: I'm one of those "older UA members".
NONE of Robert's Rules is insignificant. They all exist to ensure due
process. From what I have observed so far, it is ONLY when senators try to
circumvent due process that we have to wank about the rules for 20 minutes
to get things straightened out. If you didn't try to cut off discussion
before everyone has been heard, and if you didn't try to end the meeting
before everything on the agenda has been brought up (including guests who
waited on you patiently with the assumption that you would get to them
eventually), you wouldn't have "obscure" rules imposed in an attempt to get
back on track.
Senate meetings are always going to be long. There are important issues to
discuss, so if you don't want to discuss them... don't be a senator. I
agree that the meetings have been too long lately, but the solution to that
problem likely has more to do with guest speakers than it does with
parliamentary procedure.
Allan's point is that tonight, several of you abandoned your sworn duty,
insulting fellow undergraduates who relied on you to take them seriously,
and that is not okay. I'm inclined to agree with him.
-hwkns
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Janet Li <jli12@mit.edu> wrote:
> I agree. I do think that what happened tonight shows that we need to thin=
k
> about possibly restructuring our meetings in a way that will make Senate
> most successful and productive and happy for everyone. The point of Rober=
t's
> Rules of Order is to give us order at our meetings, but, as you guys have
> already seen at almost every one of our Senate meetings this year, our
> nitpicking over the more obscure and not as important rules often just ge=
ts
> in the way and makes our meetings incredibly inefficient and dysfunctiona=
l.
> I am fully in support of Will's bill that we "postponed indefinitely" tod=
ay
> (too bad I can't vote).
>
> Another reason I feel strongly about this is that we have been trying to
> increase UA communication with students this year, and one of our goals w=
as
> to get more students to come to Senate meetings. The way they've been goi=
ng,
> I wouldn't even *want* undergrads to come and see how ineffectually they
> start to run--and that only happens after we start to be under parliament=
ary
> procedure. Have you noticed that? We are all very happy and get along fin=
e
> during discussion mode, and later, when we have to follow Robert's Rules,
> there is always some controversial rule brought up or motion made, chaos
> reigns, people snap at each other, and the meeting gets more tedious and
> even longer.
>
> We will turn people off if we keep sticking to these rules. I remember
> thinking they were intimidating and strange when I first joined Senate. I
> don't understand why Senate has to be so formal anyway. I don't want to
> continue this tradition of having long and exhausting and vicious meeting=
s.
> I want people to actually *want* to come to Senate, and not have it be a
> mind-numbing, time-wasting chore.
>
> Older UA members are probably used to Robert's Rules, because it is the
> status quo, but let's see if ANY of the new Senators seriously enjoy them=
,
> especially the more obscure and insignificant ones that we fight over and
> make us waste even more of our evenings. Some of the main ones are
> definitely useful for keeping order, but I really think that we would
> proceed more efficiently and happily if we didn't nitpick over some of th=
e
> minor ones.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Michael E Plasmeier <theplaz@mit.edu>wr=
ote:
>
>> Thanks. I understand that many of the Senators wished to adjourn for th=
e
>> night because they have other personal issues to attend to tonight which=
may
>> be more important than changes to Athena/printing. However, as an
>> outsider I would suggest that Senate meetings would be more successful i=
f
>> they discussed actual issues facing students rather than Robert=92s Rule=
s of
>> Order. I know this is challenging to do to make sure that all students =
will
>> have a voice (see the bill that failed today) =96 but at the same time
>> Robert=92s rules is an endurance contest, where students who do not endu=
re do
>> not get a view. I also understand that Robert=92s Rules were written in=
1876
>> by people who had all the time in the world=85..
>>
>>
>>
>> (I just shudder about sitting there for another few hours next Monday. =
I
>> have a deep, deep respect for the senators who do this every Monday.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your time
>>
>>
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* thebigal1@gmail.com [mailto:thebigal1@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *=
Allan
>> Miramonti
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 18, 2010 11:54 PM
>> *To:* ua-senate@mit.edu
>> *Subject:* Tonight's meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am writing to let Senate know that I am not okay with the actions take=
n
>> by Senate tonight with regards to skipping over scheduled business and
>> discussion. Thankfully, we found a way to backtrack a bit and have you
>> guys do your jobs. I would like to remind my fellow senators that you t=
ook
>> an oath to do your jobs, and that means attending to the business at han=
d.
>> I do not care that it is past your bedtime, nor do I care about your
>> personal opinion on an agenda item. If you are too lazy to represent th=
e
>> student body, I recommend you resign immediately.
>>
>> I don't fault those who make motions that are within everyone's rights t=
o
>> make, but I do demand that our senators care about their office.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>> Allan Miramonti
>> Random Senator
>>
>
>
--0015174bdc7ac7c0010492f18830
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Full disclosure:=A0 I'm one of those "older UA members".<br><=
br>NONE of Robert's Rules is insignificant.=A0 They all exist to ensure=
due process.=A0 From what I have observed so far, it is ONLY when senators=
try to circumvent due process that we have to wank about the rules for 20 =
minutes to get things straightened out.=A0 If you didn't try to cut off=
discussion before everyone has been heard, and if you didn't try to en=
d the meeting before everything on the agenda has been brought up (includin=
g guests who waited on you patiently with the assumption that you would get=
to them eventually), you wouldn't have "obscure" rules impos=
ed in an attempt to get back on track.<br>
<br>Senate meetings are always going to be long.=A0 There are important iss=
ues to discuss, so if you don't want to discuss them... don't be a =
senator.=A0 I agree that the meetings have been too long lately, but the so=
lution to that problem likely has more to do with guest speakers than it do=
es with parliamentary procedure.<br>
<br>Allan's point is that tonight, several of you abandoned your sworn =
duty, insulting fellow undergraduates who relied on you to take them seriou=
sly, and that is not okay.=A0 I'm inclined to agree with him.<br><br>
-hwkns<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:26 =
AM, Janet Li <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jli12@mit.edu">jli12@m=
it.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
I agree. I do think that what happened tonight shows that we
need to think about possibly restructuring our meetings in a way that
will make Senate most successful and productive and happy for everyone.
The point of Robert's Rules of Order is to give us order at our
meetings, but, as you guys have already seen at almost every one of our Sen=
ate meetings this year, our nitpicking over the more obscure and not as imp=
ortant rules often just gets in the way and makes our meetings incredibly i=
nefficient and dysfunctional. I am
fully in support of Will's bill that we "postponed indefinitely&qu=
ot; today (too bad I can't vote).<br>
<br>
Another reason I feel strongly about this is that we have been trying to
increase UA communication with students this year, and one of our goals
was to get more students to come to Senate meetings. The way they've
been going, I wouldn't even <i>want</i> undergrads to come and see how =
ineffectually they start to run--and that only happens after we start to be=
under
parliamentary procedure. Have you noticed that? We are all very happy
and get along fine during discussion mode, and later, when we have to
follow Robert's Rules, there is always some controversial rule brought =
up or motion made, chaos reigns, people snap at each other, and the
meeting gets more tedious and even longer.<br>
<br>
We will turn people off if we keep sticking to these rules. I remember thin=
king they were intimidating and strange when I first joined Senate. I don&#=
39;t
understand why Senate has to be so formal anyway. <font style=3D"font-famil=
y: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" size=3D"1"><font style=3D"font-family: time=
s new roman,serif;" size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,=
sans-serif;"></span></font></font>I don't want to continue this traditi=
on of having long and exhausting and vicious meetings. I want people to act=
ually <i>want</i> to come to Senate, and not have it be a mind-numbing, tim=
e-wasting chore. <br>
<br>Older UA members are probably used to Robert's Rules, because it is=
the status quo, but let's see if ANY of the new Senators seriously enj=
oy them, especially the more obscure and insignificant ones that we fight o=
ver and make us waste even more of our evenings. Some of the main ones are =
definitely useful for keeping order, but I really think that we would proce=
ed more efficiently and happily if we didn't nitpick over some of the m=
inor ones.<div>
<div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Michae=
l E Plasmeier <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:theplaz@mit.edu" targ=
et=3D"_blank">theplaz@mit.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0=
pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple" lang=3D"EN-US"><div><p class=3D"MsoNorm=
al"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thanks.=A0 I =
understand that many of the Senators wished to adjourn for the night becaus=
e they have other personal issues to attend to tonight which may be more im=
portant than changes to Athena/printing.=A0 =A0=A0However, as an outsider I=
would suggest that Senate meetings would be more successful if they discus=
sed actual issues facing students rather than Robert=92s Rules of Order.=A0=
I know this is challenging to do to make sure that all students will have =
a voice (see the bill that failed today) =96 but at the same time Robert=92=
s rules is an endurance contest, where students who do not endure do not ge=
t a view.=A0 I also understand that Robert=92s Rules were written in 1876 b=
y people who had all the time in the world=85..</span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 1=
25);">=A0</span></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; =
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">(I just shudder about sitting there for another f=
ew hours next Monday.=A0 I have a deep, deep respect for the senators who d=
o this every Monday.)</span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 1=
25);">=A0</span></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; =
color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thank you for your time</span></p><p class=3D"Mso=
Normal">
<span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">=A0</span></p><p =
class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125)=
;">-Michael</span></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size: 11pt=
; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">=A0</span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt;">From:</span></b>=
<span style=3D"font-size: 10pt;"> <a href=3D"mailto:thebigal1@gmail.com" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">thebigal1@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:thebigal1=
@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">thebigal1@gmail.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>=
Allan Miramonti<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 18, 2010 11:54 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href=3D"mai=
lto:ua-senate@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">ua-senate@mit.edu</a><br><b>Subjec=
t:</b> Tonight's meeting</span></p><div><div></div><div><p class=3D"Mso=
Normal">
=A0</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Hello,<br><br>I am writing to let Senate know=
that I am not okay with the actions taken by Senate tonight with regards t=
o skipping over scheduled business and discussion.=A0=A0 Thankfully, we fou=
nd a way to backtrack a bit and have you guys do your jobs.=A0 I would like=
to remind my fellow senators that you took an oath to do your jobs, and th=
at means attending to the business at hand.=A0 I do not care that it is pas=
t your bedtime, nor do I care about your personal opinion on an agenda item=
.=A0 If you are too lazy to represent the student body, I recommend you res=
ign immediately. <br>
<br>I don't fault those who make motions that are within everyone's=
rights to make, but I do demand that our senators care about their office.=
<br><br>Respectfully,<br>Allan Miramonti<br>Random Senator </p></div></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div style=3D"visibility: hidden; displa=
y: inline;" id=3D"avg_ls_inline_popup"></div><style type=3D"text/css">#avg_=
ls_inline_popup { position:absolute; z-index:9999; padding: 0px 0px; ma=
rgin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; width: 240px; overflow: hidden; word-w=
rap: break-word; color: black; font-size: 10px; text-align: left; line-=
height: 13px;}</style>
--0015174bdc7ac7c0010492f18830--
