[72] in UA Senate
Re: Meeting this evening - discuss!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron Liu)
Tue Oct 13 19:22:50 2009
In-Reply-To: <4AD4FA49.1080108@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:22:26 -0400
From: Aaron Liu <rfliu@MIT.EDU>
To: Adam Bockelie <bockelie@mit.edu>
Cc: Sammi Wyman <swyman@mit.edu>, Paul Baranay <pbaranay@mit.edu>,
Catherine A Olsson <catherio@mit.edu>,
Rachel E Meyer <remeyer@mit.edu>, ua-senate@mit.edu
--000e0cd29ec6bfd99e0475d9516d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hey everyone,
I would like to address Catherine's questions about me before I go before
the Senate tonight for the hearing.
I want to join the UA because I am genuinely interested in what the UA
does. I really want to get involved with the issues at hand and help out
with the current and future ventures of the UA. Not only do I think it'll be
fun and interesting, but I also think I'll learn a lot about the Institute,
which I already have from the exec meetings and the budget meeting last
week.
After seeing last year what the UA is all about, such as during issues
like dining, I wanted to apply for any sort of position to get involved and
hands-on experience. However, because I was a freshman and it was my first
semester on grades, I didn't know how much time I could allocate to the UA
and what my schedule would be like. This is why I applied for the UA, and
specifically the Communications Committee, during the summer.
I wanted to join CommComm because this is one area I truly believe I can
make a solid contribution. Regarding past leadership experience, I was part
of the student government as a senator for all four years of high school.
This is another reason why I wanted to continue getting involved in
government. Furthermore, I founded a club my sophomore year in high school
and publicized it well enough that I had approximately 150 members by the
end of that school year. Furthermore, I rowed my four years of high school
and rowed my freshmen year here at MIT. This experience has taught me a lot
about teamwork, which I think is essential to getting things done as a
committee. Lastly, I joined the debate team to compete in parliamentary
debate tournaments, which has helped me develop strong communication skills.
As for what I want to accomplish on CommComm, I mainly want to get
creative. For example, I want to restructure DormStorm, which I have already
started planning, so that it would be more meaningful and interactive with
students. I want to get the ideas of Community Conservations and Office
Hours going as soon as possible. These events will not only open more
channels of communication between the general student body, administration,
and UA leadership, but also boost the image of the UA. Finally, I look
forward to working with committees, senators, and all other UA officers in
publicizing events, connecting meaningfully with students, distributing
major information to the student body, etc.
Given the importance of making the student body aware of certain things,
I'm very excited and motivated to do a good job, set goals for this
committee, and get these goals accomplished. I look forward to meeting you
all and clarifying any questions you may have tonight.
Thank you so much for your time and I'm sorry that was such a long email!
Sincerely,
Aaron
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Adam Bockelie <bockelie@mit.edu> wrote:
> That report is posted on the senate Legislation page, as Supplement - UA
> CAR proposal
>
> Sammi Wyman wrote:
>
>> About the Alumni Relations Bill:
>>
>> I thought Adnan's Report on his vision for the committee was great,
>> although that much info obviously can't really be worked into the bill.
>> Would anyone object to that going out to senate? I wasn't really sure why
>> that was just sent to exec-members.
>>
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Paul Baranay wrote:
>>
>> The Finboard Chair and Vice-Chair just sent me the allocations. They are
>>> located at
>>>
>>> 41 UAS 1 - Summer Fall 2009 Finboard Appeals <
>>> http://web.mit.edu/ua/senate/UAS41/pending/41%20UAS%201%20-%20Summer%20Fall%202009%20Finboard%20Appeals.xls
>>> >
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Catherine A Olsson <catherio@mit.edu<mailto:
>>> catherio@mit.edu>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortuantely, I haven't seen any posted proposal yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Rachel E Meyer wrote:
>>>
>>> One thing really quickly... for #4, is there a posted
>>> proposal yet? Or even just a total amount being additionally
>>> allocated during appeals, or a list a groups receiving money?
>>> Something? I don't think Senate needs to go through this
>>> very carefully, but individuals should have the opportunity to
>>> do so and I think those 2 things (total $ amount and list of
>>> groups) are important top-level issues for Senate to
>>> know/consider.
>>> -Rachel
>>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Catherine A Olsson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> There's a very long meeting coming up this evening, and I
>>> haven't seen
>>> any email on the discussion list yet hashing out our
>>> opinions on any of
>>> the legislation. This definitely isn't optimal, given how
>>> inefficient it
>>> is to try to work out all our opinions in-person at a
>>> meeting without
>>> having talked about them at all beforehand, and how easy
>>> it is to talk
>>> about things on the mailing list. Personally I don't have
>>> anything
>>> particularly controversial to say about this week's
>>> agenda, which is why
>>> I haven't spoken up yet, but that is probably no excuse
>>> for me to not
>>> have done so.
>>>
>>> With quite a few hours left before the meeting, I'm sure
>>> we can have at
>>> least a little productive discussion before then, and make
>>> sure the
>>> meeting isn't horrendously long. (also pardon my
>>> unprofessional
>>> kibitzing in the parenthetical comments, it's mostly
>>> directed at new
>>> senators)
>>>
>>> Here's where I stand on a few important points. Let's discuss!
>>> 1. The UA planning task force report looks great and we
>>> should approve
>>> it without much fuss. (go ahead and disagree with me, it's
>>> more
>>> efficient to do so here and now than in person!)
>>>
>>> 2. I intend to vote to approve Adam Bockelie as dining
>>> chair, SheeShee
>>> Jin as Space Planning chair, and Alexandra Jordan as
>>> Sustainability
>>> chair, and don't feel I need more information on them
>>> before voting. (if
>>> you want more information, ask someone now!)
>>> 2a. I'd like to know a bit more about Aaron Liu's plans as
>>> Communications Chair. I think communications is one area
>>> that the UA
>>> could do *much* better at, and in the question phase of
>>> his confirmation
>>> hearing I hope to convey that to the nominee. Can anyone
>>> provide
>>> information about Aaron Liu's history in the UA, or his
>>> plans as
>>> communication chair?
>>>
>>> 3. To the authors of 41 U.A.S. 1.2, I'd like to see the
>>> bill altered to
>>> clarify who MIT's alumni base is a strong asset to -
>>> students, the
>>> institute, the UA, etc? I'd also like to see some
>>> clarification as to
>>> whether the committee will focus on relationships between
>>> individual
>>> students and individual alumni, or students as a whole and
>>> alumni, or
>>> something else. In short, I support the bill but think its
>>> current
>>> phrasing is unclear.
>>>
>>> 4. I sat on Finboard during the appeals meeting as Senate's
>>> representative, and will glady defend the allocations if
>>> people have any
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> 5. The UA operating budget should be approved as it
>>> stands. Yes, I am
>>> concerned that we are spending so much money on PLUS and
>>> Athletics
>>> Weekend, but think that should be a target for future
>>> budgets, not the
>>> current budget. I am glad that there are concrete plans to
>>> hand off PLUS
>>> next year, and would like to see this promise held to.
>>> Thus I am
>>> considering authoring a bill requiring the management of
>>> PLUS to be
>>> handed over by next year as promised - is there support
>>> among other
>>> senators?
>>>
>>> 6. The election transparency act is a great bill. I would
>>> have written
>>> it myself if it hadn't been done already.
>>>
>>> 7. Suspending the minimum meeting interval is a necessary
>>> action for
>>> this meeting, and this bill should be passed with no fuss.
>>> Perhaps we
>>> should amend the Senate bylaws to allow for six days, not
>>> seven, between
>>> meetings - is there support?
>>>
>>> Also, please look over the minutes if you haven't already
>>> to make sure
>>> we can vote on them quickly! We shouldn't need to spend
>>> time in meetings
>>> reading over past minutes since they're available beforehand.
>>>
>>> That's all I can think of for now. Here's hoping for only
>>> a three-hour
>>> meeting tonight (/wishful thinking)...
>>>
>>> Respectfully,
>>> Catherine Olsson, Random Hall Senator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Adam Bockelie
> 801.209.7233
> <bockelie@mit.edu>
>
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
> Class of 2011
>
--000e0cd29ec6bfd99e0475d9516d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey everyone,<br><br>I would like to address Catherine's questions abou=
t me=A0 before I go before the Senate tonight for the hearing. <br>=A0=A0 I=
want to join the UA because I am genuinely interested in what the UA does.=
I really want to get involved with the issues at hand and help out with th=
e current and future ventures of the UA. Not only do I think it'll be f=
un and interesting, but I also think I'll learn a lot about the Institu=
te, which I already have from the exec meetings and the budget meeting last=
week. <br>
=A0=A0 After seeing last year what the UA is all about, such as during issu=
es like dining, I wanted to apply for any sort of position to get involved =
and hands-on experience. However, because I was a freshman and it was my fi=
rst semester on grades, I didn't know how much time I could allocate to=
the UA and what my schedule would be like. This is why I applied for the U=
A, and specifically the Communications Committee, during the summer. <br>
=A0=A0 I wanted to join CommComm because this is one area I truly believe I=
can make a solid contribution. Regarding past leadership experience, I was=
part of the student government as a senator for all four years of high sch=
ool. This is another reason why I wanted to continue getting involved in go=
vernment. Furthermore, I founded a club my sophomore year in high school an=
d publicized it well enough that I had approximately 150 members by the end=
of that school year. Furthermore, I rowed my four years of high school and=
rowed my freshmen year here at MIT. This experience has taught me a lot ab=
out teamwork, which I think is essential to getting things done as a commit=
tee. Lastly, I joined the debate team to compete in parliamentary debate to=
urnaments, which has helped me develop strong communication skills. <br>
=A0=A0 As for what I want to accomplish on CommComm, I mainly want to get c=
reative. For example, I want to restructure DormStorm, which I have already=
started planning, so that it would be more meaningful and interactive with=
students. I want to get the ideas of Community Conservations and Office Ho=
urs going as soon as possible. These events will not only open more channel=
s of communication between the general student body, administration, and UA=
leadership, but also boost the image of the UA. Finally, I look forward to=
working with committees, senators, and all other UA officers in publicizin=
g events, connecting meaningfully with students, distributing major informa=
tion to the student body, etc. <br>
=A0=A0 Given the importance of making the student body aware of certain thi=
ngs, I'm very excited and motivated to do a good job, set goals for thi=
s committee, and get these goals accomplished. I look forward to meeting yo=
u all and clarifying any questions you may have tonight. <br>
<br>Thank you so much for your time and I'm sorry that was such a long =
email! <br><br>Sincerely,<br><br>Aaron<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On=
Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Adam Bockelie <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:bockelie@mit.edu">bockelie@mit.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">That report is po=
sted on the senate Legislation page, as Supplement - UA CAR proposal<br>
<br>
Sammi Wyman wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"im"=
>
About the Alumni Relations Bill:<br>
<br>
I thought Adnan's Report on his vision for the committee was great, alt=
hough that much info obviously can't really be worked into the bill. =
=A0Would anyone object to that going out to senate? I wasn't really sur=
e why that was just sent to exec-members.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Paul Baranay wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb=
(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=
=3D"im">
The Finboard Chair and Vice-Chair just sent me the allocations. =A0They are=
located at<br>
<br></div>
41 UAS 1 - Summer Fall 2009 Finboard Appeals <<a href=3D"http://web.mit.=
edu/ua/senate/UAS41/pending/41%20UAS%201%20-%20Summer%20Fall%202009%20Finbo=
ard%20Appeals.xls" target=3D"_blank">http://web.mit.edu/ua/senate/UAS41/pen=
ding/41%20UAS%201%20-%20Summer%20Fall%202009%20Finboard%20Appeals.xls</a>&g=
t;<br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
Paul<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Catherine A Olsson <<a href=3D"mailto:c=
atherio@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">catherio@mit.edu</a> <mailto:<a href=
=3D"mailto:catherio@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">catherio@mit.edu</a>>>=
wrote:<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0Unfortuantely, I haven't seen any posted proposal yet.<br>
<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Rachel E Meyer wrote:<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0One thing really quickly... =A0for #4, is there a posted<br=
>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0proposal yet? =A0Or even just a total amount being addition=
ally<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0allocated during appeals, or a list a groups receiving mone=
y?<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Something? =A0I don't think Senate needs to go through=
this<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0very carefully, but individuals should have the opportunity=
to<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0do so and I think those 2 things (total $ amount and list o=
f<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0groups) are important top-level issues for Senate to<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0know/consider.<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-Rachel<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Catherine A Olsson wrote:<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hi all,<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0There's a very long meeting coming up this even=
ing, and I<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0haven't seen<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0any email on the discussion list yet hashing out ou=
r<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0opinions on any of<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the legislation. This definitely isn't optimal,=
given how<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inefficient it<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is to try to work out all our opinions in-person at=
a<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0meeting without<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0having talked about them at all beforehand, and how=
easy<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it is to talk<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0about things on the mailing list. Personally I don&=
#39;t have<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0anything<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0particularly controversial to say about this week&#=
39;s<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0agenda, which is why<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I haven't spoken up yet, but that is probably n=
o excuse<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for me to not<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0have done so.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0With quite a few hours left before the meeting, I&#=
39;m sure<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0we can have at<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0least a little productive discussion before then, a=
nd make<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0sure the<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0meeting isn't horrendously long. (also pardon m=
y<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0unprofessional<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0kibitzing in the parenthetical comments, it's m=
ostly<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0directed at new<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0senators)<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Here's where I stand on a few important points.=
Let's discuss!<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01. The UA planning task force report looks great an=
d we<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0should approve<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it without much fuss. (go ahead and disagree with m=
e, it's<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0more<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0efficient to do so here and now than in person!)<br=
>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02. I intend to vote to approve Adam Bockelie as din=
ing<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0chair, SheeShee<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jin as Space Planning chair, and Alexandra Jordan a=
s<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Sustainability<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0chair, and don't feel I need more information o=
n them<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0before voting. (if<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0you want more information, ask someone now!)<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02a. I'd like to know a bit more about Aaron Liu=
's plans as<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Communications Chair. I think communications is one=
area<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that the UA<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0could do *much* better at, and in the question phas=
e of<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0his confirmation<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hearing I hope to convey that to the nominee. Can a=
nyone<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0provide<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0information about Aaron Liu's history in the UA=
, or his<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0plans as<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0communication chair?<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A03. To the authors of 41 U.A.S. 1.2, I'd like to=
see the<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0bill altered to<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0clarify who MIT's alumni base is a strong asset=
to -<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0students, the<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0institute, the UA, etc? I'd also like to see so=
me<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0clarification as to<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0whether the committee will focus on relationships b=
etween<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0individual<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0students and individual alumni, or students as a wh=
ole and<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0alumni, or<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0something else. In short, I support the bill but th=
ink its<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0current<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0phrasing is unclear.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A04. I sat on Finboard during the appeals meeting as =
Senate's<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0representative, and will glady defend the allocatio=
ns if<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0people have any<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0questions.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A05. The UA operating budget should be approved as it=
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0stands. Yes, I am<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0concerned that we are spending so much money on PLU=
S and<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Athletics<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Weekend, but think that should be a target for futu=
re<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0budgets, not the<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0current budget. I am glad that there are concrete p=
lans to<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hand off PLUS<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0next year, and would like to see this promise held =
to.<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Thus I am<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0considering authoring a bill requiring the manageme=
nt of<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PLUS to be<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0handed over by next year as promised - is there sup=
port<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0among other<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0senators?<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A06. The election transparency act is a great bill. I=
would<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0have written<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it myself if it hadn't been done already.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A07. Suspending the minimum meeting interval is a nec=
essary<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0action for<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0this meeting, and this bill should be passed with n=
o fuss.<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Perhaps we<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0should amend the Senate bylaws to allow for six day=
s, not<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0seven, between<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0meetings - is there support?<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Also, please look over the minutes if you haven'=
;t already<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to make sure<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0we can vote on them quickly! We shouldn't need =
to spend<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0time in meetings<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reading over past minutes since they're availab=
le beforehand.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0That's all I can think of for now. Here's h=
oping for only<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0a three-hour<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0meeting tonight (/wishful thinking)...<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Respectfully,<br>
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Catherine Olsson, Random Hall Senator<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
-- <br>
Adam Bockelie<br>
801.209.7233<br>
<<a href=3D"mailto:bockelie@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">bockelie@mit.edu<=
/a>><br>
<br>
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br>
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering<br>
Class of 2011<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
--000e0cd29ec6bfd99e0475d9516d--
