[699] in UA Senate
Re: HDAG Summaries Posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David M. Templeton)
Mon May 3 20:16:13 2010
From: "David M. Templeton" <dtemp@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <4BDF5AA7.9000505@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:16:09 -0400
Cc: ua-senate@mit.edu, ua-dining <ua-dining@mit.edu>
To: Adam Bockelie <bockelie@mit.edu>
I'd like to point out the lack of quality of these minutes; it is =
perhaps disingenuous to even call them minutes.
There are no details, no discussion of proposals, no opinions of the =
present members, no votes. This isn't really the transparency we need =
to see if the student members of the committee are doing their jobs =
satisfactorily, or if the admin members of the committee are listening =
to them. Did we expect better minutes, or is this the type of committee =
that keeps ongoing discussion under wraps?
Also, I'd like to be able to trace the progression of ideas from the =
HDAG meetings, to the final HDAG report, to the final decision by =
Colombo; this would show us how ideas were shaped over time, and how =
much student input was taken into consideration. Do we even know if =
we're going to get a copy of the full HDAG report at the end?
Dave
On May 3, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Adam Bockelie wrote:
> Senate,
>=20
> HDAG has posted summaries of each meeting on the House Dining Review =
site.
>=20
> [http://studentlife.mit.edu/house-dining-review/updates#May3]
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Adam Bockelie
> 801.209.7233
> <bockelie@mit.edu>
>=20
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
> Class of 2011
