[64] in UA Senate
Meeting interval
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Dehnert)
Tue Oct 13 16:02:04 2009
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:00:36 -0400
From: Alex Dehnert <adehnert@MIT.EDU>
To: Tim Jenks <trjenks@gmail.com>
CC: Catherine A Olsson <catherio@mit.edu>, ua-senate@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <a0c7d52e0910131243i339bf939n29a7430ea58bb38f@mail.gmail.com>
Tim Jenks wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Catherine A Olsson <catherio@mit.edu>wrote:
>>
>> 7. Suspending the minimum meeting interval is a necessary action for
>> this meeting, and this bill should be passed with no fuss. Perhaps we
>> should amend the Senate bylaws to allow for six days, not seven, between
>> meetings - is there support?
> And I think your #7 is a good idea. (amending bylaws for 6 days between
> meetings) Would an amendment to 41 UAS 1.4 or a new bill proposed next
> meeting be more appropriate to see this change?
>
>
I would recommend a new bill proposed next meeting. This one is
suspending, not amending, the bylaws. There is no real hurry to amend
the bylaws (and, actually, I think ConstComm may be presenting several
amendments next week, so it would make sense to batch this with those).
Proposing a bill for next week gives more time for people to think about
the idea.
~~Alex
