[417] in UA Senate

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Link to NomComm legislation

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Maggie Delano)
Fri Feb 19 01:26:14 2010

In-Reply-To: <9d4f87ed1002081951uf89b900h912911aa2e5a2717@mail.gmail.com>
From: Maggie Delano <maggied@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:25:50 -0500
To: hwkns@mit.edu
Cc: Ted Hilk <thilk@mit.edu>, UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu>

--0016e6460868cb879f047fee285c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

To get this conversation going a bit more before Senate Monday, where I
intend to author this bill:

Ted:My thoughts were VP + 2 exec = 3 exec, VS + 2 senate = 3 senate, do you
disagree?

Hawkins: I would say that Senators selected to help serve in the Spring
would continue to serve until new Senators were appointed, either in the
Fall or Spring of the following year. Do you think it would be helpful to
state this explicitly? I think that it is probably okay for us to be
somewhat lenient on when the Senate and Exec reps turn over.

-Maggie



On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Daniel Hawkins <hwkns@mit.edu> wrote:

> I think this looks good.  My only initial feedback is that you might want
> to consider the effects of appointing people on that time line - senators in
> the spring are not necessarily senators in the following fall, and that
> messes with your statement about what the committee should "consist" of and
> possibly makes NomComm less functional during the fall.  Am I reading it
> wrong, or is that an issue?
>
> -hwkns
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ted Hilk <thilk@mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> I think this is a solid step toward solving the problem.  The NomComm that
>> it creates might be a bit exec-heavy, though.  Has there traditionally been
>> difficulty in finding enough Senate members to serve on it?
>>
>> Ted
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Maggie Delano <maggied@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> http://web.mit.edu/maggied/Public/UA/nomcommreform.pdf
>>>
>>> -Maggie
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Theodore Hilk
>> Massachusetts Institute of Technology '13
>> Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
>> Sloan School of Management
>> thilk@mit.edu | 913.375.6503
>>
>
>

--0016e6460868cb879f047fee285c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To get this conversation going a bit more before Senate Monday, where I int=
end to author this bill:<br><br>Ted:My thoughts were VP + 2 exec =3D 3 exec=
, VS + 2 senate =3D 3 senate, do you disagree?<br><br>Hawkins: I would say =
that Senators selected to help serve in the Spring would continue to serve =
until new Senators were appointed, either in the Fall or Spring of the foll=
owing year. Do you think it would be helpful to state this explicitly? I th=
ink that it is probably okay for us to be somewhat lenient on when the Sena=
te and Exec reps turn over.<br>

<br clear=3D"all">-Maggie<br><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Daniel =
Hawkins <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hwkns@mit.edu">hwkns@mit.ed=
u</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">

I think this looks good.=A0 My only initial feedback is that you might want=
 to consider the effects of appointing people on that time line - senators =
in the spring are not necessarily senators in the following fall, and that =
messes with your statement about what the committee should &quot;consist&qu=
ot; of and possibly makes NomComm less functional during the fall.=A0 Am I =
reading it wrong, or is that an issue?<br>


<br>-hwkns<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ted Hilk <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:thilk@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">thilk@mit.edu</a>&gt;</span> wr=
ote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, =
204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>I think this is a solid step toward solving the problem.=A0 The NomCom=
m that it creates might be a bit exec-heavy, though.=A0 Has there tradition=
ally been difficulty in finding enough Senate members to serve on it?</div>



<div><br>Ted</div><div><div></div><div>
<div><br>=A0</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Maggie Delano <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:maggied@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">m=
aggied@mit.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px=
 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class=3D"gmail_quote"><a href=3D"http:/=
/web.mit.edu/maggied/Public/UA/nomcommreform.pdf" target=3D"_blank">http://=
web.mit.edu/maggied/Public/UA/nomcommreform.pdf</a><br>




<font color=3D"#888888"><br clear=3D"all">-Maggie<br><br></font></blockquot=
e></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br></div></div><font color=3D"#888888">-- <b=
r>Theodore Hilk<br>Massachusetts Institute of Technology &#39;13<br>Departm=
ent of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science<br>




Sloan School of Management<br><a href=3D"mailto:thilk@mit.edu" target=3D"_b=
lank">thilk@mit.edu</a> | 913.375.6503<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e6460868cb879f047fee285c--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post