|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:34:51 -0400 From: "Liz A. Denys" <lizdenys@MIT.EDU> To: ua-senate@mit.edu I wrote a resolution which is available at http://web.mit.edu/ua/senate/UAS41/pending/41%20UAS%202.2%20Resolution%20to%20Continue%20Transparency%20and%20Representation%20throughout%20the%20Institute-wide%20Planning%20Process.pdf For new senators, recall that resolutions are for legislation where the Senate does not have direct power over seeing it through, but still strongly believes the proposal put forward should happen. The piece itself is fairly straightforward, but I did want to clarify a couple of things now and also make myself available for questions regarding my resolution before Senate. Clarification 1: The Project Teams mentioned in the second "that" statement refers to the Project Teams mentioned in the Institute-wide Planning Task Force's Preliminary Report. According to that report, these teams will be formed to investigate the feasibility of recommendations, and each team will cover an overarching area of work. Even though Project Teams may seem vague at first glance (if you did not read that report), it is referring to something very specific. Clarification 2: The third "that" clause points to MIT senior leadership because they will ultimately make decisions, whereas the Planning Task Force Coordinators will be giving forth "final recommendations." These recommendations will have to be approved by the senior leadership before being implemented. Again, if you have any questions, I'd love to answer them. -Liz Denys, UA Secretary General -- Elizabeth A. Denys Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Class of 2011 Department of Electrical Engineering Department of Mathematics 630.730.1136 | lizdenys@mit.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |