[1265] in UA Senate
Continuing the discussion of UA restructuring
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Janet Li)
Thu Apr 14 22:19:25 2011
From: Janet Li <jli12@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:18:42 -0400
To: ua-cipr@mit.edu, ua-restructure@mit.edu, ua-senate@mit.edu
--bcaec539646483a06004a0ebab7b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
While the proposed new structure for the UA did not pass Dormcon or the UA
Senate today, I want to make sure that these discussions on UA restructuring
don't die. There are still a lot of problems with how the UA is structured.
I think almost everyone agrees on this, and on the fact that it is
beneficial to reevaluate it and try to come up with the best possible
structure.
Many people expressed objections to the new proposal because of how quickly
it moved. They felt that we did not start from the beginning to closely
examining the current UA structure and its problems before trying to come up
with a solution.
I've started a google doc to try to address this concern and outline some of
the problems with the current UA structure.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18o3dwCpPcpv6KRxVWtKv0txKfmNjjp1T3qiBe3Y_v5o/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKn5yaYHI'm
not sure exactly how we should move forward, but maybe we can restart
the discussions here.
Janet
-------------------------------------------------------
Janet Li
MIT Class of 2012
Department of Urban Studies & Planning
*jli12@mit.edu | janetli.mit@gmail.com*
-------------------------------------------------------
--bcaec539646483a06004a0ebab7b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While the proposed new structure for the UA did not pass Dormcon or the UA =
Senate today, I want to make sure that these discussions on UA restructurin=
g don't die. There are still a lot of problems with how the UA is struc=
tured. I think almost everyone agrees on this, and on the fact that it is b=
eneficial to reevaluate it and try to come up with the best possible struct=
ure.<br>
<br>Many people expressed objections to the new proposal because of how qui=
ckly it moved. They felt that we did not start from the beginning to closel=
y examining the current UA structure and its problems before trying to come=
up with a solution.<br>
<br>I've started a google doc to try to address this concern and outlin=
e some of the problems with the current UA structure. <a href=3D"https://do=
cs.google.com/document/d/18o3dwCpPcpv6KRxVWtKv0txKfmNjjp1T3qiBe3Y_v5o/edit?=
hl=3Den&authkey=3DCKn5yaYH">https://docs.google.com/document/d/18o3dwCp=
Pcpv6KRxVWtKv0txKfmNjjp1T3qiBe3Y_v5o/edit?hl=3Den&authkey=3DCKn5yaYH</a=
> I'm not sure exactly how we should move forward, but maybe we can res=
tart the discussions here.<br>
<br>Janet<br><br clear=3D"all"><font style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,s=
ans-serif" size=3D"2"><font style=3D"font-family:times new roman,serif"><sp=
an style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"></span></font></font><f=
ont style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size=3D"2"><font style=
=3D"font-family:times new roman,serif"><span style=3D"font-family:arial,hel=
vetica,sans-serif"><font face=3D"arial,helvetica,sans-serif">--------------=
-----------------------------------------<br>
Janet Li<br>MIT Class of 2012<br>Department of Urban Studies & Planning=
<br><b><a href=3D"mailto:jli12@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">jli12@mit.edu</a>=
| <a href=3D"mailto:janetli.mit@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">janetli.mit@g=
mail.com</a></b><br>
</font></span></font></font><font style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans=
-serif" size=3D"2"><font style=3D"font-family:times new roman,serif"><span =
style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font face=3D"arial,helvet=
ica,sans-serif">-------------------------------------------------------</fo=
nt></span></font></font><br>
--bcaec539646483a06004a0ebab7b--
