[1201] in UA Senate
Re: Brigg Fields Lights
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jessica Chen)
Wed Mar 16 04:02:28 2011
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTineYGekTKrWs+XXYjk34rm9TiK5sE_nzdtB2DR1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jessica Chen <jessicachen.dbhs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:01:45 -0400
To: Adam Bockelie <bockelie@mit.edu>
Cc: "Benjamin I. Shaibu" <bshaibu@mit.edu>, ua-senate@mit.edu
--20cf30563969214c72049e94f7f2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I believe I asked this during the discussion and the response would
something similar to a time frame they would be on (ie til 2?) probs
something about 1 hour after saferide stops running imo
I mean a concern would be where this project would fall under for finances,
is it like under MIT facilities??
also I'm pretty sure the proposal would have the lights placed in a way to
not interfere with sports otherwise it probably wouldn't be an option
because there's always gonna be uproar when messing with their sports
Sincerely,
~Jessica Chen
MIT 2014
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Adam Bockelie <bockelie@mit.edu> wrote:
> they should be dark sky friendly
>
> Sent from my mobile device.
>
> On Mar 16, 2011 1:17 AM, "Benjamin I. Shaibu" <bshaibu@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Last week, we discussed the possibility of having lights and a dirt path
> added to Briggs Field to help Simmonites cross to Campus Drive. I was
> interested in knowing how other Senators felt about the proposal. The
> responses from my constituents were generally for the idea - most people
> seemed really interested. There was one email worrying about the need for
> lights and the costs. They brought up a point I personally wondered about;
> would a path affect the Sports Teams on the field?
>
> Another resident wondered if the lights could be optimized to be motion
> sensored (to save money).
>
> Best,
>
> Ben
> New House Senator
>
>
--20cf30563969214c72049e94f7f2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I believe I asked this during the discussion and the response would somethi=
ng similar to a time frame they would be on (ie til 2?) probs something abo=
ut 1 hour after saferide stops running imo<br><br>I mean a concern would be=
where this project would fall under for finances, is it like under MIT fac=
ilities??<br>
<br>also I'm pretty sure the proposal would have the lights placed in a=
way to not interfere with sports otherwise it probably wouldn't be an =
option because there's always gonna be uproar when messing with their s=
ports<br>
<br clear=3D"all">Sincerely,<br>~Jessica Chen<br>MIT 2014<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Adam Bo=
ckelie <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bockelie@mit.edu">bockelie@m=
it.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); paddi=
ng-left: 1ex;">
<p>they should be dark sky friendly</p>
<p>Sent from my mobile device.<br><br></p><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"=
>
<p></p><blockquote type=3D"cite">On Mar 16, 2011 1:17 AM, "Benjamin I.=
Shaibu" <<a href=3D"mailto:bshaibu@mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">bsha=
ibu@mit.edu</a>> wrote:<br><br>Hey,<br><br>Last week, we discussed the p=
ossibility of having lights and a dirt path added to Briggs Field to help S=
immonites cross to Campus Drive. I was interested in knowing how other Sena=
tors felt about the proposal. The responses from my constituents were gener=
ally for the idea - most people seemed really interested. There was one ema=
il worrying about the need for lights and the costs. They brought up a poin=
t I personally wondered about; would a path affect the Sports Teams on the =
field?<br>
<br>Another resident wondered if the lights could be optimized to be motion=
sensored (to save money).<br><br>Best,<br><br>Ben<br>New House Senator<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
--20cf30563969214c72049e94f7f2--
