[317] in UA Exec
Re: You are being lied to.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vinayak Ranade)
Tue Apr 6 16:45:25 2010
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:45:16 -0400
From: Vinayak Ranade <vinayak@MIT.EDU>
To: Quentin Smith <quentin@mit.edu>
CC: Keri Garel <thekeri@mit.edu>, Jessica H Lowell <jessiehl@mit.edu>,
Martin F Holmes <goholmes@mit.edu>, "Liz A. Denys" <lizdenys@mit.edu>,
Andrew Lukmann <lukymann@mit.edu>, Ted Hilk <thilk@mit.edu>,
hwkns@mit.edu, Nathaniel Fox <natefox@mit.edu>,
Alexandra Jordan <amjordan@mit.edu>,
Anthony Rindone <arindone@mit.edu>, UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu>,
UA Executive Board <ua-exec@mit.edu>, cfs@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1004061459330.25430@dr-wily.mit.edu>
As I understand it, the McCormick dining hall is protected by a separate
endowment. Thus the deficit from the McCormick dining hall gets covered
by restricted funds (as opposed to the rest of dining that gets covered
by general MIT funds). I can also find no verification that the
McCormick house government doesn't want their dining program. It would
be nice if someone living in McCormick could validate/deny these claims.
Vinayak
Quentin Smith wrote:
> Isn't McCormick the dorm where the housemaster insists on having a
> house dining program, ignoring the please of the house government?
> That doesn't seem like an advocate for student choice in dining...
>
> --Quentin
