[3132] in SIPB-AFS-requests
Re: [timely] Re: Proceeding with new-rosebud
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Tue Aug 25 01:49:45 1998
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>, sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 Aug 1998 13:39:48 EDT."
<199808211739.NAA09541@x15-cruise-basselope.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 01:49:34 EDT
> My intent is to go ahead with the listed plan, however jhutz suggested
> that it would be appropriate to changeaddr old-rosebud and bring up
> new-rosebud before doing the volume moves, as opposed to doing the
> volume moves and then changeaddr's new-rosebud to old-rosebud. That
> seems reasonable since it means we can run db servers on new-rosebud
> sooner, minimizing the db server outage.
Yeah, that makes sense.
> My understanding of ubik is that a server will never vote for another
> server who is not voting for themselves. I.e. ra would never vote for
> rb unless rb voted for rb.
Wow, I'd never heard of that. I'm not saying it isn't the case, just
that I'd never heard of it.
Jonathon
