[2512] in SIPB-AFS-requests
Re: Potential SIPB cell outage Friday 10/25/96 at 1700
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mhpower@MIT.EDU)
Fri Oct 25 01:38:23 1996
From: mhpower@MIT.EDU
To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Cc: sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: "[2509] in SIPB-AFS-requests"
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 01:38:03 EDT
from [2502]:
>Assuming the new kernel continues to work, I think this patch should
>be installed on all of the other 4.1.3_U1 machines. Presumably this
>should happen on reynelda before reynelda becomes a database server,
>to minimize the likely impact of the outage.
So, will the outage on Friday allow for a reboot of reynelda with
a new kernel, do people think that it's a better idea to reboot
as part of a much more disruptive later outage that takes down a
db server, or is the feeling that the patch is unnecessary (maybe
it's expected that getsockopt will never be called on reynelda)?
Matt
