[99903] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: How Not to Multihome

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Keegan.Holley@sungard.com)
Mon Oct 8 19:25:54 2007

In-Reply-To: <470AB411.3060004@bogus.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>, owner-nanog@merit.edu, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,
        "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
From: Keegan.Holley@sungard.com
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:14:08 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 007FA3B58525736E_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

please elaborate.  My knowledge of IPv6 is admittedly lacking, but I 
always assumed that the routing tables would be much larger if the 
internet were to convert from IPv4 due to the sheer number of networks 
available.





Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> 
Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
10/08/2007 06:49 PM

To
Keegan.Holley@sungard.com
cc
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog <nanog@merit.edu>, 
owner-nanog@merit.edu, "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
Subject
Re: How Not to Multihome







Keegan.Holley@sungard.com wrote:
> 
> I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those
> same routers with ipv6 routes.

All 970 of them?

joelja

> 
> 
> *Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>*
> Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> 
> 10/08/2007 06:10 PM
> 
> 
> To
>                "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
> cc
>                nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
> Subject
>                Re: How Not to Multihome
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own
>> announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.
> 
> it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely
> growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion) and
> vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class
> routers.
> 
> randy
> 
> 
> 





--=_alternative 007FA3B58525736E_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">please elaborate. &nbsp;My knowledge
of IPv6 is admittedly lacking, but I always assumed that the routing tables
would be much larger if the internet were to convert from IPv4 due to the
sheer number of networks available.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Joel Jaeggli &lt;joelja@bogus.com&gt;</b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">10/08/2007 06:49 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Keegan.Holley@sungard.com</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Randy Bush &lt;randy@psg.com&gt;, nanog
&lt;nanog@merit.edu&gt;, owner-nanog@merit.edu, &quot;Justin M. Streiner&quot;
&lt;streiner@cluebyfour.org&gt;</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: How Not to Multihome</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2><br>
Keegan.Holley@sungard.com wrote:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those<br>
&gt; same routers with ipv6 routes.<br>
<br>
All 970 of them?<br>
<br>
joelja<br>
<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; *Randy Bush &lt;randy@psg.com&gt;*<br>
&gt; Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; 10/08/2007 06:10 PM<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br>
&gt; To<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&quot;Justin
M. Streiner&quot; &lt;streiner@cluebyfour.org&gt;<br>
&gt; cc<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;nanog
&lt;nanog@merit.edu&gt;<br>
&gt; Subject<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Re:
How Not to Multihome<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;&gt; It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their
own<br>
&gt;&gt; announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely<br>
&gt; growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion)
and<br>
&gt; vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class<br>
&gt; routers.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; randy<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br>
--=_alternative 007FA3B58525736E_=--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post