[99884] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: two questions - SWAG answers entertained
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Lewis)
Mon Oct 8 12:54:13 2007
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:49:00 -0400
From: Jason Lewis <jlewis@packetnexus.com>
To: James Aldridge <jhma@mcvax.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <98AFE75FC9238D9FD7492DB3@dhcp177.ripe.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
The nature of registry data leads to bugs like this, they should all be
RIPENCC.
jas
James Aldridge wrote:
>
> --On 8 October 2007 10:50:49 -0400 Jason Lewis
> <jlewis@packetnexus.com> wrote:
>> RIB IP Coverage for
>> RIPENCC 312598027 13.9%
>> RIB IP Coverage for
>> RIPE 197332093 8.8%
>
>
> Just out of interest, what's the difference between "RIPENCC" (the
> Regional Registry?) and "RIPE" (a vaguely defined group of people who
> contribute to the RIPE working group mailing lists and/or attend RIPE
> meetings and/or have some interest in IP networking in and around
> Europe and/or ... ?) here?
>
> James
>
