[99753] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Creating demand for IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Wed Oct 3 15:44:30 2007
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:43:31 -0400
From: "William Herrin" <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>
To: "michael.dillon@bt.com" <michael.dillon@bt.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0012215F8@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 10/3/07, michael.dillon@bt.com <michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote:
> > If you care to wager, I'll take some of that action. Without
> > a relatively transparent mechanism for IPv6-only hosts to
> > access IPv4-only sites this isn't going to happen. We don't
> > have such a mechanism built and won't have it deployed in 12 months.
>
> What about these two?
> http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/Transitioning:_6to4
Michael,
As mentioned, 6to4 doesn't do what you seem to think it does. Its not
a solution to the problem of IPv6 endpoints trying to talk to IPv4
endpoints.
> http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/Transitioning:_NAT-PT
Looks interesting. There's some version 0.4 user-space software for
Linux which claims to do it and Cisco claims to do it in IOS 12.4
advanced enterprise.
Let me know how it works out for you when you try it in "many to one"
mode. That is, many IPv6 addresses behind 1 IPv4 address, what Cisco
still insists on calling port address translation.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
