[99696] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Oct 2 17:20:54 2007
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:15:19 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
CC: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2FE91EAE-05D5-413C-8A60-955202482CBC@cisco.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>> and that is not what happened last time, so why should it happen
>> this time?
> In fact, it's reasonable to assume that we will again filter
> prefixes.
i agree but fear that it will be harder to find the filter algorithms
this time.
> Hopefully, the ISP that is forced into this position will have the
> insight to accept cash in exchange for filter exceptions. This will
> be the start of the market place for routing table slots.
last time, it was not offers of payment which caused the removal of
phyltres, but the whining at the filterers' s&m folk. "we're very
important and your customers will not be able to reach us. and we'll
tell our mommy and all our friends that you're mean and nasty."
randy
