[99642] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JAKO Andras)
Mon Oct 1 09:14:50 2007
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: JAKO Andras <jako.andras@eik.bme.hu>
To: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>
cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20071001124859.GB307@reiftel.karrenberg.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Since there are no features that cannot be had with IPv4 this only
Scalable interdomain multicast? Think of the MSDP-mess in IPv4 vs embedded
RP in IPv6. I know, I know, this won't drive IPv6 deployment, but just for
the record, this is something solved with v6 and missing with v4. Maybe
it'll be interesting sometime.
Andras
