[99610] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alain Durand)
Fri Sep 28 22:09:21 2007
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:59:11 -0400
From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <46FDA078.7060101@psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--B_3273861551_55601
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
On 9/28/07 8:46 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
>
> but, ome months back, some wiser heads in the ivtf listened and agreed
> that nat-pt (no, alain, i will not be silly and let people force me to
> confuse things by calling it something else), is seriously required even
> though it is disgusting to us all. thank you russ and jari; and i am
> sure others will climb on the bandwagon and wave flags.
>
>
> ---> I do not care so much how people want to call this, as long as it is
> understood that this should not only solve the v6->v4 case but also the other
> way round for the reasons I mentioned this morning.
>
> As about liking NAT or not, honestly, this is totally beside the point. I have
> real problems to solve.
- Alain.
--B_3273861551_55601
Content-type: text/html;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG =
Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE=3D"Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:12.0px'><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 9/28/07 8:46 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYL=
E=3D'font-size:12.0px'><BR>
<BR>
but, ome months back, some wiser heads in the ivtf listened and agreed<BR>
that nat-pt (no, alain, i will not be silly and let people force me to<BR>
confuse things by calling it something else), is seriously required even<BR=
>
though it is disgusting to us all. thank you russ and jari; and i am<=
BR>
sure others will climb on the bandwagon and wave flags.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
---> I do not care so much how people want to call this, as long as it i=
s understood that this should not only solve the v6->v4 case but also the=
other way round for the reasons I mentioned this morning.<BR>
<BR>
As about liking NAT or not, honestly, this is totally beside the point. I h=
ave real problems to solve.<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STY=
LE=3D'font-size:12.0px'><BR>
&nb=
sp;- Alain.</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--B_3273861551_55601--
