[99520] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Sep 26 12:52:23 2007
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:48:33 -0000."
<20070926004833.GA16093@vacation.karoshi.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:32:05 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1190824325_2839P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:48:33 -0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com said:
> true enough. i guess this means that we get IPv6 "as is, where is"
> and there will be limited new development of same.
I can't conceive of any possible solution to IPv6 mobility, multihoming,
routing, <insert deficiency here> which would find the mere fact that the
WG is closed a problem, given that a decade of the WG being *open* didn't
produce deployable results.
--==_Exmh_1190824325_2839P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFG+omFcC3lWbTT17ARAnK2AKDfDOrX7lMcohkBGL4jPhRw6R36iwCZAaY1
Q6nrwTv452ISQyym0VEhIEU=
=HQCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1190824325_2839P--
