[99417] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Lewis)
Fri Sep 21 08:06:24 2007

Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:52:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
To: Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au>
cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <003701c7fc42$ffa3bb70$046f09cb@ltdbeast>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Lincoln Dale wrote:

>> No, but someone previously posted that with later software versions, when
>> TCAM runs out, packets for those routes that fit in TCAM are hardware
>> switched, and only traffic for the remaining routes that didn't fit are
>> software switched.
>
> that would have been me.  and the comments on the logic still stand (as
> correct) provided you are running the appropriately non-ancient release of
> code.

Do you know in what version this behavior was changed?  At the very least, 
people are going to want to upgrade IOS, as it'll likely mean the 
difference between slightly increased MSFC CPU and a switch that can't 
cope.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post