[99356] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff McAdams)
Wed Sep 19 08:16:53 2007
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:14:25 -0400
From: Jeff McAdams <jeffm@iglou.com>
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
CC: Xin Liu <smilerliu@gmail.com>,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <04e301c7fa77$c0dbc8f0$6601a8c0@atlanta.polycom.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA2A2C24E97A3117325C7B3B5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> ... is it reasonable to assume clock synchronization in the rest
>> of our design?
> In general, it is not. I can't think of any existing protocol that
> does, actually.
Kerberos.
--=20
Jeff McAdams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
--------------enigA2A2C24E97A3117325C7B3B5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG8RKnXkUmzpmSrfwRAsFEAJ9ZoEDcFIjioPyDls+1y11L39cNpQCgxMLX
Gt799YoFeKaPO7uIWAcmRHA=
=UfH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigA2A2C24E97A3117325C7B3B5--
