[99345] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Going dual-stack, how do apps behave and what to do as an operator (Was: Apple Airport Extreme IPv6 problems?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Sep 18 17:52:45 2007
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: "<michael.dillon@bt.com>" <michael.dillon@bt.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:29:38 +0200."
<80D2DE9C-F218-47E6-A810-330D4AA6BAE7@muada.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:51:45 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1190152305_4811P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:29:38 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
> they can't do it in hardware or with decent speed in software) but
> there are no cheap(er) Juniper boxes that are suitable for deployment
> as a 5 - 200 Mbps tunnel box, in my opinion.
I presume your thinking is that by the time you get to 200Mbps of tunneled
stuff, it's time to get native mode turned up?
What's the prevailing "common wisdom" on that?
--==_Exmh_1190152305_4811P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFG8EhxcC3lWbTT17ARAgcFAKD8m/vcAgevAcaT2ZqW/hAdZMQCjQCg9Pdv
fWXFhJTyxnu1BDZ6EH8yIJE=
=Qph/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1190152305_4811P--
