[99254] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Criminals, The Network, and You [Was: Something Else]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Sullivan)
Wed Sep 12 13:00:48 2007
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:59:33 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
In-Reply-To: <D7D0907E265A834D995B9B4FC0078D4E76B019@aristotle.boi.corp.us.digitar.com>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andrew@ca.afilias.info
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:13:00AM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems to me reverse DNS just isn't an acceptable anti-spam measure.
> Too many broken reverses exist with smaller companies (try getting a 3rd
> party to fix it). It's not that hard for a bot to figure out a DSL's
On this topic, I again solicit remarks from interested parties on the
IETF dnsop reverse-mapping-considerations draft, which the editors
currently think is baked. If you have remarks about it, now would be
an excellent time to make them:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations/
Thanks!
A
--
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8
jabber: ajsaf@jabber.org +1 416 646 3304 x4110
