[99232] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Church, Charles)
Tue Sep 11 11:35:38 2007
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:34:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200DE36ECF294B43891F0F70908C62F1015F104D@mspe2k1.cs.myharris.net>
From: "Church, Charles" <cchurc05@harris.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I'm willing to bet that Cisco's sales team is pushing back a little on
this enhancement. Given the choice between prolonging the usefulness of
Sup2 for another year or two versus selling a massive amount of new
Sup720-3BXLs, I'm betting they'll do the later.
Chuck=20
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Sam Stickland
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:55 AM
To: Forrest
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
> =20
There's a couple of feature requests open at Cisco that would do this.=20
Rodney Dunn (at Cisco) pushed quite hard for these but couldn't get any=20
traction. As he's previously pointed out it would have if people would=20
vote for them (attach a case to).
FORWARDED MESSAGE:
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Take your pick. :)=20
CSCsa45474 Ability to block overlapping BGP prefixes from being
installed in RIB
or better:
CSCsa46049 IOS RIB should not install overlapping routes with same next
hop
Rodney
