[99222] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Sprunk)
Mon Sep 10 12:05:53 2007
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen@sprunk.org>
To: "Jon Lewis" <jlewis@lewis.org>, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: "North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:16:17 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Thus spake "Jon Lewis" <jlewis@lewis.org>
> The trouble is, it turns out there are a number of networks where
> CIDR isn't spoken. They get their IP space from their RIR, break
> it up into /24s, and announce those /24s (the ones they're using
> anyway) into BGP as /24s with no covering CIDR.
IMHO, such networks are broken and they should be filtered. If people doing
this found themselves unable to reach the significant fraction of the Net
(or certain key sites), they would add the covering route even if they were
hoping people would accept their incompetent/TE /24s.
S
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
