[99151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using Mobile Phone email addys for monitoring
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu Sep 6 22:27:44 2007
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:21:41 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: "Jason J. W. Williams" <williamsjj@digitar.com>
Cc: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>,
matthew zeier <mrz@velvet.org>, Rick Kunkel <kunkel@w-link.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <D7D0907E265A834D995B9B4FC0078D4E76AFA7@aristotle.boi.corp.us.digitar.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:04:44PM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Our experience with using the e-mail-to-SMS gateways provided by
> AT&T/Cingular and T-Mobile:
>
> AT&T: Messages come through with very little delay (even during alert
> storms).
As long as you're sourced from ARIN IP space. If sourced from
for exmaple, APNIC space, you may have mixed results or lack of service.
This has been my experience, even when there is proper rDNS, SPF, and other
such methods being used. This means you need to relay via an alias elsewhere.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
