[99085] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Wed Sep 5 05:57:49 2007
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:26:39 +0930
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>, Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>,
nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20070904041932.GA5270@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 04:19:32 +0000
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 09:37:46PM -0400, John Curran wrote:
> >
> > At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
> > >
> > >Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and believe it can be replaced?
> >
> > Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of
> > transition planning as we received with IPv6...
> > ;-)
> > /John
>
> well, if you let the IETF do it...
>
Well, if you're too lazy to participate ... you'll have accept what
you're given. If you're not happy with that, get off your butt and do
something about it.
--
"Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
alert."
- Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"
