[99073] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Stuart)
Tue Sep 4 09:44:58 2007

To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:34:27 +0100."
             <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709041432200.1341@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> 
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:42:49 +0000
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart@tech.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
> > Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
> > "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
> 
> TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
> per-flow?

How would you define "user" in that context?

Stephen

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post