[98973] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Osmon)
Mon Aug 27 15:13:52 2007
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:12:09 -0600
From: John Osmon <josmon@rigozsaurus.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>, Jason LeBlanc <jml@packetpimp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: John Osmon <josmon@rigozsaurus.com>, nanog@merit.edu,
Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>, Jason LeBlanc <jml@packetpimp.org>
In-Reply-To: <46D2B1B6.1050800@packetpimp.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:12:54AM -0400, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
>
> OT: He probably meant MOP and LAT are not routable, man that brings back
> memories.
Yeah, I realy did, but my fingers typed 'decnet isn't routable' because
that how the folks I worked with at the time described the issue. I was
young at the time, and didn't understand the nuances (as opposed to
being older and missing nuances now).
My old nuerons took over when I composed the message, sorry for the
confusion. Thanks to all the folks that have replied off-list.
The (on topic) answers are coming where I expected them:
- keep routing boundaries congruent
- at local edges / stubs do whatever you want, but do it in private,
and wash your hands afterwards (with appologies to R.A. Heinlein)
