[98452] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Wed Aug 8 18:36:30 2007

From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 21:17:44 GMT
To: mairhart@cisco.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Michael Airhart <mairhart@cisco.com> wrote:

>I can't speak for Cisco or Cisco IT, but as evidenced by this email, =

at least part of our connectivity is up.
>
>No doubt someone official is looking at it as we speak.  (I'll just =

lurk Nanog to get the skinny)..
>

Cisco's problem seems to be have been resolved.

Also see:

 http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/08/update_ciscocom_site.html

Thanks to everyone for their verification. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)

wj8DBQFGujLsq1pz9mNUZTMRAu7pAJ4s2GtvR24DNGyLwGmEeaz6sLQx7gCfZW/J
ALFp5DbrxnvdxL9Qfl8OyHk=3D
=3D0gF2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/






home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post