[98375] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large organization nameservers sending icmp packets to dns servers.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 6 16:50:23 2007
To: Matthew Crocker <matthew@crocker.com>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>,
Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:11:36 EDT."
<91950559-F40E-4370-8AC1-707F93BFDB4A@crocker.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:43:15 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1186432995_3572P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:11:36 EDT, Matthew Crocker said:
> But you could, it isn't hard to dump a BGP view into a box from a
> border router and use that map to determine the proper DNS records to
> return.
It's harder than it looks, given the number of people who pop up on this list
and ask how to get BGP to Do The Right Thing when 2 paths are the same length
but vastly differing in bandwidth, number-of-actual-hops, and/or latency....
--==_Exmh_1186432995_3572P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGt4fjcC3lWbTT17ARAm2rAJ4wxERLYYJX50I9ttbytWZk3jwUAQCglhAX
gLB1C2ENWPZrOh92Yxa88cE=
=APor
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1186432995_3572P--
