[97848] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: TCP congestion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Wilcox)
Thu Jul 12 16:18:35 2007
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:09:24 +0100
From: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox@packetrade.com>
To: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <352820.35037.qm@web30813.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Well, if its out of order its the same as if its lost or delayed, it needs to see that missing segment before the window is full
As mentioned you need to get dumps from both ends, you will almost definitely find that you have packet loss which tripped tcp's slow start mechanism.
Steve
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:02:49PM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> Even if the segment was received out of order what would cause congestion avoidance to starve the connection of legitimate traffic for 15 to 20 seconds? That is the core of the problem.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> To: Brian Knoll <Brian.Knoll@tradingtechnologies.com>
> Cc: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com>; nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:56:06 AM
> Subject: Re: TCP congestion
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Brian Knoll ((TTNET)) wrote:
>
> > If the receiver is sending a DUP ACK, then the sender either never
> > received the first ACK or it didn't receive it within the timeframe it
> > expected.
>
> or received it out of order.
>
> Yes, a tcpdump trace is the first step.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
