[97729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pete Templin)
Fri Jun 29 20:15:24 2007
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:14:30 -0500
From: Pete Templin <petelists@templin.org>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C2AB05AC.19FC55%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> My view is that deploying only IPv6 in the LANs is the wrong approach in the
> short term, unless you're sure that all your applications are ready, or you
> have translation tools (that often are ugly), and you're disconnected from
> the rest of the IPv4 Internet.
You're entitled to your view.
>> De: Barrett Lyon <blyon@blyon.com>
>> Responder a: <blyon@blyon.com>
>> CC: <nanog@merit.edu>
>>
>>> If you deploy dual-stack, it is much easier to keep doing the DNS
>>> queries
>>> using IPv4 transport, and there is not any practical advantage in
>>> doing so
>>> with IPv6 transport.
>> Thanks Jordi, not to sound too brash but, I'm already doing so. I am
>> trying not to deploy a hacked v6 service which requires an incumbent
>> legacy protocol to work.
As said by others, the core infrastructure really should be ready for
v6-only. Why should it be so hard?
pt
